LCCI faults suspension of Banks from forex transactions

The Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI) on Sunday described the suspension of nine Banks from foreign exchange (forex) transactions as counter productive.
  LCCI Director General, Muda Yusuf said: “These are shocks that the economy can ill afford at this time”.
   According to Yusuf, it is right to penalize banks for proven infractions, “but this should be done in a way to minimize collateral effects on investors and the larger economy, given the high sensitivity of the economy to developments in the foreign exchange market”.
 Calling for caution, Yusuf explained that for an economy that is in fragile mode; “and for an economy that is highly exchange rate sensitive, policy actions and pronouncements that could impact the market should be done with utmost caution and care”.
Yusuf in a statement said: “There should be more creative and less disruptive ways of imposing such sanctions. Many innocent investors and citizens are already bearing the brunt of this action given the unprecedented hike in naira exchange rate”.
 He added: “Ongoing forex transactions in the affected banks have been stalled with serious consequences for investors.
“The second major policy development that could pose a risk to the stability and transparency of the foreign exchange market is the recent policy on sectoral allocation of foreign exchange.
  Explaining further, he said: “Perhaps the major challenge facing the Nigerian economy at this time is the inability to regain the confidence of investors, both local and foreign.
  “Regrettably, the instability and inconsistency in the foreign exchange management policy have been complicating matters. The economy has a major structural defect of being heavily import dependent. This cannot be fixed in the short term.
 “Therefore, the shocks arising from the collapse of oil price and the corresponding depreciation in the naira exchange rate were inevitable. But the policy responses could make a whole lot of difference in the profundity of the impacts of these shocks on the economy and the citizens.
“Historically, autonomous supply of foreign exchange had been a higher than the CBN supply. But this has virtually dried up because of the collapse of investors’ confidence. Of course, the plunge in crude oil price was a major causal factor. But perhaps the bigger issue is the unstable and inconsistent foreign exchange policy which has continued to create uncertainty in the forex market, thus deepening the liquidity problems”.
 Part of the statement read: “The CBN circular did not indicate any HS Code to properly define what would qualify as raw materials and machineries. The first concern will be that of definition. The result of this will be discretionary interpretation by the banks as what qualifies as raw materials and machineries.
“The second major concern is the potential crowding out of other sectors in the forex market. Sectors outside the manufacturing sector account for over 85% of the country’s GDP and jobs in the economy. They all have varying import contents in their operations.
 “Therefore, if a minimum of 60% of all forex allocation goes to manufacturing for raw materials and machineries; what happens to other sectors? Currently petroleum products imports are priority and could take another 25% of foreign exchange. This implies that the rest of the sectors would settle for the balance of 15%. This is clearly not a sustainable framework.
“It is important to recognize the interdependence of sectors and the integrated nature of the economy. All sectors complement one another for the economy to function properly.
 “This is not to diminish the critical importance of the manufacturing in the economy. But we should realize that other sectors play important roles as well. Such other sectors include ICT, Telecoms, real estate, transportation, Aviation, Maritime, tourism, Hospitality, Entertainment, Agriculture, distributive trade, Health services, education services, broadcasting, print media, solid minerals, Engineering and construction among others.
 “There are also very important invisibles that will require foreign exchange. The sustainability of the forex sectoral allocation policy is in doubt. It could only create more confusion in the foreign exchange market.
“Fiscal policy measures are better suited to address sectoral imbalances than monetary policy. Such policy tools include import tariffs, taxation and other incentives.
 “Above all, there is need to upscale infrastructure investments very urgently. These are the more effective ways to fix the structural problems of the economy than monetary policy. What is key for monetary authorities is to ensure that financial markets are efficient and transparent; and to ensure that there is discipline among players.
“This is the time to seek quick wins. One of the quick wins is to review current trade policy measures in order to reduce the pressure of cost on investors and citizens. The exchange rate depreciation has an inherent structural correction effects on the economy. It naturally rewards inward looking initiatives and resource based enterprises. It is too much of a shock on the economy to combine high import duty regimes with a weak and rapidly depreciating currency.
 “Conversion of import values at current exchange rates for purposes of computation of import duty and other port charges have escalated costs beyond measure and had paralyzed many businesses.
 “The burden of cost and inflation has become unbearable, which is what the economy is experiencing at the moment. The poverty situation has also aggravated. The proposition here is to moderate the inflationary pressures and ease poverty conditions by reviewing import duty regimes and the various trade facilitation issues at the nation’s ports. This could be done without undermining current economic diversification drive.
“There should be a more effective oversight over the terminal operators and shipping companies to curb unfair charges on imports and exports made possible by the several monopoly structures in the maritime sector.
“Ensuring a balance between the interests of investors, producers, consumers and the welfare of citizens is a strategic imperative at this time”.